
The authors consider both the nature of state strength and thechanging capabilities of the states most likely to construct globalarchitecture. Demonstrating that the traditional structures of global order--hegemony, bipolarity, and mutlipolarity -- are inconsistent with existing andproject patterns of state strength, they present a provocative alternative modelthat reflects the "creeping incrementalism" of multilateralinstitutions and the "institutionalised group hegemony" of the G-7states. In the final chapter, they explore the weaknesses of the presentarchitectural arrangements and discuss alternate scenarios.
| l a chappell g a combe michael e porter christof teuscher j paul roth | s coll anne horton richard s larson ian beardsley kato horai |