This is a very good and concise book for those interested in Indian Philosophy, but don't know where to start. Of the many books I have tried, this is one of the best ones for a glimpse of the Indian Philosophy. Those interested in philosophy should indeed read this book. the writing is as vivid and powerful as it gets. A philosophy lover will find this volume as well as the next volume simply unputdownable.

ITS AN EXCELLENT BOOK HAVING 600 PAGES. I MUST CONFESS THE ENGLISH IS HARD. IT HAS COVERED VERY WELL THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIAN SPIRITUAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHTS STARTING FROM THE ARYANS AND RIG VEDA TO JAINISM AND BUDDHISM. THERE ARE LOT OF CONCEPTS AND ONLY IF YOU HAVE SOME PREVIOUS IDEAS ABOUT IT THEN ONLY YOU CAN GRASP IT FULY. I HAVE COMPLETED ONE READING BUT I FEEL I HAVE TO GIVE ANOTHER READING TO FULLY UNDERSTAND IT. NEVERTHELESS ITS AN EXCELLENT AND ALL ENCOMPASSING BOOK.

Book begins with introduction to history of Vedas. First few chapters leads to boredom. But as you progress from Fourth chapter it raises your eyebrows from sleep. and takes your ride to eternal and ultimate consciousness of our ancestors which I am loving the most.

This book is extremely long. It is meant for those who are doing Ph.d. in philosophy. This book is not meant for ordinary readers. It has so many contradictory and technical words. It has so many opinions. It is a definitely a NO NO for those who want to read it light. The book contains so many opinions and theories. The words used are extremely technical for a comman reader to understand.

The book is those for who are pursuing career in philosophy. It is exactly a text book material.

Excellent !!! Must read book

An incredible tracing the development of Indian philosophy as a single tradition of thought by s.radhakrishnan with an introduction by. J.N Mohanty

Best book for philosophy .....

Good

It is a good product & vary good book also for all UG & upper students.👌

Would have been better if the author had stuck to facts than speculating on scriptures without basis. For eg. He says much of manu smriti is defective . He does such speculation in many places.
This is the classic fallacy of not learning and understanding the Vedas, angas and upangas under a guru but just commenting based on self learning and western research. While one can get a good idea on philiospical chapters, many unwanted speculations made by author makes this book more a authors self...