From Ballot to Bench

From Ballot to Bench (English, Paperback, Dubois Philip L.)

Share

From Ballot to Bench  (English, Paperback, Dubois Philip L.)

Be the first to Review this product
₹4,326
6,287
31% off
i
Available offers
  • Bank Offer5% Unlimited Cashback on Flipkart Axis Bank Credit Card
    T&C
  • Delivery
    Check
    Enter pincode
      Delivery by1 Jul, Tuesday|15
      ?
    View Details
    Author
    Read More
    Highlights
    • Language: English
    • Binding: Paperback
    • Publisher: University of Texas Press
    • Genre: Political Science
    • ISBN: 9780292768666, 9780292768666
    • Edition: 1980
    • Pages: 332
    Seller
    AtlanticPublishers
    3.6
    • 7 Days Replacement Policy
      ?
  • See other sellers
  • Description
    Over several decades, many U.S. states abandoned the practice of selecting their judges by direct popular election and adopted the Missouri Plan of judicial selection. In From Ballot to Bench, Philip L. Dubois subjects the various criticisms raised against judicial elections to a more searching scrutiny than previously has been attempted. Dubois carefully reviews the three central counts on which judicial elections have been faulted: for lowering the quality of the bench, for impairing judicial independence, and for failing to secure judicial accountability. After concluding that the potential for judicial elections to hold judges popularly accountable is what might commend them over alternative selection methods, Dubois concentrates on the analysis of empirical evidence to evaluate judicial elections as mechanisms of accountability. The study examines all the statewide partisan and nonpartisan elections for state supreme court justices in non-southern states from 1948 to 1974. Included is a detailed examination of voter participation, electoral competition, the behavior of judicial electorates, and the patterns of gubernatorial vacancy appointments. An analysis of decision making on eight state supreme courts also tests the relationship between different selection systems and judicial behavior. Dubois finds that partisan elections maximize voter participation, meaningfully structure voter choices, minimize accession to the bench by appointment, and allow popular control over gubernatorial appointments. Additional evidence on the extent of partisan voting by judges selected under different methods leads Dubois to conclude that partisan elections are superior to both nonpartisan elections and nonelective selection methods as instruments of accountability. The importance of the questions addressed, the breadth of the data collected, and the unorthodox conclusions offered make this a significant book for political scientists, judges, lawyers, and public officials.
    Read More
    Specifications
    Book Details
    Imprint
    • University of Texas Press
    Publication Year
    • 1980
    Dimensions
    Height
    • 229 mm
    Length
    • 152 mm
    Weight
    • 454 gr
    Be the first to ask about this product
    Safe and Secure Payments.Easy returns.100% Authentic products.
    You might be interested in
    Philosophy Books
    Min. 50% Off
    Shop Now
    Language And Linguistic Books
    Min. 50% Off
    Shop Now
    Other Self-Help Books
    Min. 50% Off
    Shop Now
    General Fiction Books
    Min. 50% Off
    Shop Now
    Back to top